STOCKS · STRATEGY TEST
Does “sell in May” work on META?
Hold only from November through April and stay in cash for the summer months, on the old market adage.
Holding came out ahead
13.98%
“sell in May and go away” per year
17.76%
Buy & hold per year
-3.78%
Difference
rule vs held, over 9.2 years
50%
Worst drawdown
holding fell 77%
Holding META came out ahead of “sell in May and go away” over 9.2 years. Across the last 9.2 years of real prices, simply buying and holding Meta made 3.78 percentage points a year more than “sell in May and go away” (17.76% versus 13.98%). The rule did give a gentler ride: its worst fall was 49.7% against 76.7% for holding — a smoother path, paid for with some of the return.
Every rule on META, ranked
Buy and hold · benchmark17.76%
350% total · worst drawdown 76.7% · in market 100%
200-day moving average timing16.69%
313% total · worst drawdown 39.6% · in market 69%
Golden cross (50/200)16.24%
299% total · worst drawdown 38.8% · in market 68%
Sell in May (hold Nov–Apr)13.98%
233% total · worst drawdown 49.7% · in market 48%
Buy the dip (RSI < 30, hold 20d)0.59%
6% total · worst drawdown 67.1% · in market 32%
the last 9.2 years · 2,312 trading days · $149.031 → $670.24
How to read this
One asset over one window is a single data point, not a law. A rule that comes out ahead on META may trail holding on the next ticker you try — which is exactly why the free tester exists: change the asset and see whether the edge survives. When it evaporates on a different market, it was fitted to this one.
Note the drawdown column as much as the return. Most timing rules earn less than holding but fall less in a crash, and whether that trade is worth it depends entirely on whether you would actually have held through the worst of it.
Method
All strategies are measured from the same starting bar so the comparison is like-for-like. Signals are read from the previous close and the next day's return is applied — no lookahead. Prices are dividend-adjusted so buy-and-hold is not handicapped. 0.05% cost per switch. No leverage, no shorting.
Test the same rule on something else
Get the next autopsy
We test one strategy people swear by and publish whatever the data says — including when it says the strategy doesn't work. Free, no pitch.
Vorrik Research publishes tests of publicly discussed trading strategies using public market data. Where a test was also run with our own money, the article says so. It is factual reporting of what happened in historical and past live tests — not investment advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell anything. Past results never predict future results.